Best investing apps in 2025: compare features, fees and who they're for

The European P2P lending market in 2026

P2P lending in Europe has developed from a niche fintech model into a regulated part of the alternative investment market. Investors can now finance business loans, property-backed projects and other debt opportunities through digital crowdlending platforms operating across several EU countries.

The market is still fragmented. Platforms differ in licensing, borrower type, security structure, loan duration, default reporting and liquidity. A polished app can make the investment process look simple, but the underlying risk remains credit risk: the borrower may repay late, restructure the loan or fail to repay at all.

The latest completed EU market data confirms that crowdfunding has become a meaningful source of alternative finance. ESMA identified 181 active crowdfunding service providers across 21 EU Member States in 2024, with more than €4 billion raised through regulated platforms.

For investors, the important question is not whether P2P lending is growing. It is whether a specific platform can select borrowers, price risk, service loans and protect investor interests when projects underperform.

This guide explains how European investors can compare P2P lending platforms in 2026 without relying on headline interest rates alone.

How Maclear compares with a bank savings account

Many readers weighing up an investing app are already holding cash in the bank and looking for something that works harder. The table below sets one P2P option, Maclear, side by side with a traditional bank savings or deposit account so the trade-offs are clear.

Maclear figures accurate as of 2026. Not investment advice; capital is at risk, including possible total loss.

A P2P allocation is best treated as a portfolio addition (around 10%), not a replacement for liquid or lower-risk holdings.

How a Maclear loan claim works and what stands behind it

The table shows the numbers; this list explains the mechanism and where an investor's protection actually comes from.

• You buy an assigned claim to a loan already made to a vetted business borrower, rather than lending to a stranger directly.
• Interest is paid monthly, while the principal is returned at the end of the loan term.
• Each borrower carries an internal AAA–D score; treat it as a signal for comparing loans, not as investment advice.
• Where a loan is secured, the collateral is held through a Collateral Agent, and the loan-to-value ratio is published so you can judge the cushion yourself.
• A provision fund may absorb temporary delays in interest, but it is not insurance and does not guarantee that principal comes back.
• Capital is at risk throughout, including the possible loss of everything you invest.

What is P2P lending?

Peer-to-peer lending allows investors to provide capital to borrowers through an online platform. In the European business crowdfunding market, borrowers are often companies or project owners seeking an alternative to traditional bank finance.

The platform normally performs several functions:

- reviews borrower applications;

- assesses credit risk;

- structures the loan;

- publishes the investment opportunity;

- processes investor funds;

- collects repayments;

- manages arrears and recovery procedures.

Investors may choose individual loans or use an auto-invest tool that distributes capital according to predefined criteria.

The term “peer-to-peer” can be misleading. Many platforms no longer connect one private investor directly with one borrower. Loans may involve institutional investors, loan originators, special-purpose companies or several layers of contractual claims.

Before investing, it is essential to understand who owes the money and what legal right the investor receives.

P2P lending, crowdlending and loan investing

These terms are often used interchangeably, but they can describe slightly different structures.

P2P lending usually refers to investors financing loans through a digital marketplace.

Crowdlending emphasises that many investors collectively finance one borrower or project.

Loan investing is a broader term that can include direct loans, notes linked to loans, property-backed debt and managed loan portfolios.

The legal structure matters more than the label. An investor may hold:

- a direct claim against the borrower;

- a claim assigned by a loan originator;

- a note issued by the platform;

- an interest in a special-purpose vehicle;

- a participation in a managed portfolio.

These structures do not provide identical rights if the borrower, originator or platform becomes insolvent.

How the EU regulates crowdlending platforms

The European Crowdfunding Service Providers Regulation, commonly called ECSPR, introduced a common framework for investment-based and lending-based business crowdfunding across the European Union.

An authorised European crowdfunding service provider can use a single licence and passport its services across participating EU markets. This reduces the need to obtain separate permissions in every Member State.

The framework includes requirements relating to:

- information disclosure;

- governance;

- risk management;

- conflicts of interest;

- investor protection;

- credit assessment;

- complaint handling.

The regulation generally covers eligible crowdfunding offers of up to €5 million over a 12-month period. ESMA clarified in 2025 that the limit is calculated across relevant crowdfunding offers and certain other public offers made by the same project owner.

ECSPR authorisation is an important first filter, but it is not a guarantee of returns. A licensed platform can still list loans that default.

Investors should verify the provider through the ESMA register or the relevant national financial authority. The name shown in an app may differ from the legal company holding the licence.

What ECSPR does not guarantee

European regulation improves transparency and creates common operating standards. It does not turn P2P loans into bank deposits.

ECSPR does not guarantee that:

- the borrower will repay;

- the collateral will cover the full debt;

- the target return will be achieved;

- a secondary market will remain liquid;

- the platform will always remain profitable;

- investors can exit before maturity.

Crowdlending platforms should therefore be evaluated as investment businesses, not merely as software products.

How large is the EU crowdfunding market?

The latest ESMA report available in 2026 covers market activity during 2024. It identified 181 active crowdfunding service providers in 21 EU Member States and more than €4 billion raised through the sector.

Loan-based crowdfunding represented the largest share of reported activity. This is particularly relevant for P2P investors because it shows that lending remains the dominant crowdfunding model in several European markets.

The market is geographically concentrated. France, the Netherlands, Spain, Italy and Lithuania account for a substantial proportion of EU crowdfunding activity.

Country concentration creates both opportunities and risks. A platform may market itself across Europe while most of its loans remain tied to one national property market, legal system or economic sector.

Investors should assess the location of the borrowers, not only the location of the platform’s registered office.

The main types of P2P lending platforms in Europe

Business lending platforms

Business crowdlending platforms finance small and medium-sized enterprises, working capital needs, expansion projects and equipment purchases.

Loan analysis should include:

- operating history;

- revenue stability;

- profitability;

- existing debt;

- debt-service capacity;

- personal or corporate guarantees;

- sector exposure.

A business loan with a high interest rate may reflect genuine credit risk rather than a market inefficiency.

Real estate crowdlending platforms

Property-backed lending is one of the most visible European P2P categories. Investors finance bridge loans, renovation projects, developments or property acquisitions.

The presence of collateral can reduce loss severity, but it does not eliminate risk.

Investors should review:

- loan-to-value ratio;

- valuation method;

- first or second legal charge;

- development stage;

- planning permissions;

- borrower equity;

- expected exit route;

- local property-market conditions.

A projected value after construction should not be treated as current collateral value.

Loan-originator marketplaces

Some platforms list loans created by external lenders. The platform provides distribution and account infrastructure, while the originator evaluates the borrower and services the loan.

This creates several layers of risk:

1. the borrower may default;

2. the originator may fail;

3. the platform may fail;

4. a buyback obligation may not be honoured.

Investors should understand which company is responsible for underwriting, collections and any guarantee.

Managed loan portfolios

Some European platforms offer automated or managed allocation across multiple loans. These products can improve diversification and reduce manual work.

They also increase dependence on the platform’s risk model. The investor may have limited control over individual loan selection.

A managed portfolio should disclose:

- investment criteria;

- expected loss assumptions;

- portfolio concentration;

- rebalancing rules;

- loan-level information;

- treatment of late loans;

- contingency fund arrangements.

How to compare P2P lending platforms

1. Verify the licence

Start with regulatory status.

Check whether the platform operates as an authorised European crowdfunding service provider and which legal entity holds the permission. Confirm that the service offered to investors falls within the licence.

A registration number displayed on the website should be verified through an official regulator or ESMA source.

Do not assume that every product offered by a licensed group is covered by ECSPR. A company may provide regulated crowdfunding alongside products operating under a different legal framework.

2. Examine the platform’s loan book

Cumulative funded volume can demonstrate experience, but it says little about investment quality.

A platform that has financed €500 million of loans may still have poor recoveries or weak recent cohorts. Investors need performance data that separates current, late, restructured and defaulted loans.

Useful information includes:

- total outstanding principal;

- completed loans;

- delayed repayments;

- defaulted principal;

- recovered principal;

- average recovery period;

- performance by year of origination;

- performance by risk grade.

The strongest reporting follows loan cohorts over time rather than combining every historical loan into one average.

3. Understand the default definition

Platforms do not always define default in the same way.

One provider may classify a loan as defaulted after 90 days without payment. Another may continue to show it as delayed while negotiations or legal proceedings continue.

A platform can therefore appear to have a lower default rate simply because it recognises defaults later.

Investors should look for a clear policy covering:

- late-payment stages;

- restructuring;

- extensions;

- default classification;

- write-offs;

- recoveries.

Frequent extensions can hide deterioration if they are not reported transparently.

4. Compare net returns

Target interest is not the same as realised return.

The investor’s result depends on:

- borrower interest;

- defaults;

- partial recoveries;

- platform fees;

- idle cash;

- currency conversion;

- taxes;

- secondary-market discounts.

A platform advertising 12% interest may deliver less than a platform advertising 9% if its losses and cash drag are higher.

The most meaningful figure is the realised net annualised return for completed or sufficiently mature loan cohorts.

Even then, past performance does not guarantee that current loans are priced correctly.

5. Review the underwriting process

Underwriting determines which borrowers enter the platform and at what price.

A serious crowdlending platform should explain the factors used in credit assessment. These may include financial statements, bank transactions, borrower history, collateral, cash flow and sector risk.

EU technical standards require crowdfunding providers to disclose relevant information about credit scoring, loan pricing and risk-management methods.

Investors do not need access to every proprietary model input, but they should be able to understand why one loan receives a different rating and interest rate from another.

6. Assess collateral correctly

Collateral can improve recovery prospects, but only when it is valid, enforceable and conservatively valued.

Key questions include:

- Who owns the asset?

- What legal claim secures the loan?

- Is the security first-ranking?

- Was the valuation independent?

- Is the value based on current condition or future development?

- Can the asset be sold efficiently after default?

- Which costs rank ahead of investors?

A 65% loan-to-value ratio based on an optimistic future sale price may provide less protection than an 80% ratio based on a conservative current valuation.

7. Check platform financial stability

Investors are exposed to platform risk even when the loans are legally separate from the platform’s own assets.

The platform needs sufficient resources to maintain technology, compliance, borrower monitoring and collections. A provider that depends on continuous new investment may become vulnerable when origination slows.

Where available, review:

- audited accounts;

- revenue sources;

- operating profitability;

- cash reserves;

- ownership structure;

- institutional funding;

- related-party transactions.

A platform can survive without being profitable for a period, but investors should understand how it finances its operations.

8. Examine the servicing continuity plan

Loan servicing must continue if the platform stops operating.

Investors should understand:

- who holds loan records;

- who receives borrower payments;

- whether client money is segregated;

- whether a backup servicer exists;

- how investors would receive repayments after platform failure.

A wind-down plan is not proof that the transition will be seamless. It is still better than no documented process.

P2P investment returns in Europe

European P2P platforms often market returns above those available on bank deposits or traditional investment-grade bonds.

Higher expected returns normally compensate for:

- borrower credit risk;

- limited liquidity;

- platform risk;

- legal complexity;

- economic concentration;

- uncertain recoveries.

There is no reliable market-wide return that applies to every European P2P platform. Consumer loans, secured property debt and SME financing have different risk profiles.

Investors should avoid treating a platform’s target rate as a forecast for the whole portfolio.

A more realistic return estimate should include:

Expected net return = interest income − defaults − recovery costs − fees − idle cash impact

Tax may further reduce the investor’s final result depending on country of residence.

Diversification in P2P lending

Diversification is one of the most important tools in loan investing.

Spreading capital across many loans reduces the effect of one borrower default. It does not eliminate losses caused by a recession, property downturn or platform-wide underwriting problem.

A diversified P2P portfolio should consider several dimensions:

- number of loans;

- borrower sector;

- country;

- loan originator;

- collateral type;

- maturity;

- risk grade;

- platform.

Holding 100 loans from one originator in one country may be less diversified than holding 30 loans across several independent borrowers and markets.

Position size should reflect expected loss severity. A single unsecured SME loan should not represent a large share of the investor’s P2P allocation.

Auto-invest and portfolio automation

Auto-invest tools can help distribute capital across multiple loans and reduce cash drag.

The investor usually selects criteria such as:

- interest rate;

- loan term;

- country;

- risk grade;

- collateral;

- maximum amount per loan.

Automation should not replace monitoring. A platform may change its borrower mix, scoring model or loan terms without changing the investor’s saved strategy.

Investors should review auto-invest settings periodically and check whether the actual portfolio matches the intended diversification.

The fastest auto-invest system is not necessarily the best. A strong tool should prioritise transparent allocation and risk control rather than keeping every euro invested at all times.

Buyback guarantees and provision funds

Buyback guarantees are common on some European loan marketplaces. The originator promises to repurchase a loan after a specified period of delay.

This can reduce the visible impact of individual borrower defaults, but the protection depends entirely on the financial strength of the guarantor.

If many borrowers default at once, the originator may face the same stress that triggers its buyback obligations.

Investors should examine:

- who provides the guarantee;

- whether it is contractual;

- the guarantor’s financial statements;

- the delay period before repurchase;

- exclusions and conditions;

- historical buyback performance.

A buyback guarantee is not equivalent to deposit insurance.

Provision or contingency funds should be analysed in the same way. Investors need to know how the fund is financed, who controls it and whether payments are discretionary.

Secondary markets and P2P liquidity

P2P loans are generally less liquid than listed shares or exchange-traded funds.

Some platforms operate a bulletin board or internal resale feature. Under ECSPR, a crowdfunding service provider may allow clients to advertise interest in buying or selling eligible loans or securities.

ESMA has clarified that an ECSPR bulletin board cannot automatically match buyers and sellers in a way that directly results in a contract unless the operator has the separate permissions required for that activity.

This means that a platform’s “secondary market” may not function like a regulated stock exchange.

Liquidity depends on other investors being willing to buy the position. During market stress, sales may take longer or require a discount.

Before investing, check:

- which loans can be listed;

- whether delayed loans are eligible;

- transaction fees;

- historical sale times;

- available pricing data;

- platform restrictions;

- whether a buyer is guaranteed.

Money needed for near-term expenses should not be invested on the assumption that an early exit will always be possible.

Currency risk for European investors

Many European investors use platforms offering loans in euros, but some platforms also provide exposure to other currencies.

A loan can perform as expected in its local currency while producing a lower return after exchange-rate movements.

Currency risk can arise through:

- the borrower’s revenue;

- the loan denomination;

- the originator’s balance sheet;

- the investor account currency;

- platform conversion charges.

A euro-denominated loan does not always remove indirect currency exposure. A borrower earning most of its revenue in another currency may still face repayment pressure if exchange rates move sharply.

Country and legal risk

ECSPR creates common platform rules, but loan enforcement still depends partly on national law.

Recovery timelines, insolvency procedures, collateral registration and court efficiency differ across EU Member States.

Cross-border investors should understand:

- which country’s law governs the loan;

- where the borrower and collateral are located;

- which courts handle disputes;

- how security is enforced;

- whether local taxes or withholding apply.

A platform’s EU passport enables cross-border activity. It does not make every national recovery process identical.

How to assess real estate P2P loans

Property-backed crowdlending deserves a separate checklist.

Loan-to-value

Use the current market value rather than the projected value after construction whenever possible.

Borrower equity

A meaningful equity contribution can align the developer’s interests with investors.

Security ranking

First-ranking security normally provides stronger protection than a second charge or corporate guarantee.

Exit strategy

The borrower should have a credible route to repayment, such as sale, refinancing or completed-unit revenue.

Development risk

Construction delays, permitting issues and cost inflation can weaken even a well-located project.

Valuation date

An old appraisal may not reflect current local-market conditions.

Property collateral can reduce loss severity, but recovery can still be slow and expensive.

How to assess SME crowdlending loans

For business loans, focus on repayment capacity rather than the borrower’s growth narrative.

Important indicators include:

- operating cash flow;

- debt-service coverage;

- revenue concentration;

- business age;

- profit margins;

- existing secured debt;

- management experience;

- sector cyclicality.

A guarantee from a parent company or owner is useful only when the guarantor has sufficient assets and liquidity.

Investors should also consider how the loan proceeds will be used. Financing inventory linked to confirmed demand is different from financing ongoing losses.

Common red flags

A European P2P lending platform deserves extra scrutiny when it:

- presents target returns as guaranteed;

- compares loans directly with bank deposits;

- provides no verifiable licence information;

- reports funded volume but not net investor performance;

- repeatedly extends overdue loans;

- changes default definitions without explanation;

- depends heavily on one loan originator;

- publishes no information about platform finances;

- describes a bulletin board as instant liquidity;

- relies on buyback guarantees from weak companies;

- uses future property value to calculate low LTV ratios;

- hides fees inside exchange rates or borrower pricing;

- offers unusually high returns without explaining the risk.

A high interest rate is not an investment thesis.

Building a European P2P portfolio

P2P lending is usually better suited to a diversified alternative investment allocation than to an investor’s entire portfolio.

A practical approach is to:

1. keep emergency savings outside P2P platforms;

2. define the maximum portfolio allocation;

3. diversify across many borrowers;

4. limit exposure to each platform and originator;

5. spread maturities;

6. monitor late loans and recoveries;

7. reinvest selectively rather than automatically;

8. review regulatory and financial updates.

The appropriate allocation depends on the investor’s finances, risk tolerance and investment horizon. There is no percentage that suits every European investor.

The key principle is that illiquid private loans should not replace the liquid assets needed for short-term obligations.

Choosing the best P2P lending platform in Europe

There is no single best P2P platform for every investor.

One platform may offer strong real estate collateral but long maturities. Another may provide broad diversification across business loans but depend heavily on external originators. A third may offer lower expected returns with more conservative underwriting.

The best platform is the one whose:

- licence can be verified;

- legal structure is understandable;

- credit process is transparent;

- performance data is consistent;

- fees are clear;

- loans match the investor’s risk tolerance;

- recovery process is credible;

- portfolio can be diversified.

Investors should compare platforms using completed performance and downside behaviour, not only current listings.

The outlook for European crowdlending

The European P2P lending market is likely to become more regulated, data-driven and cross-border.

ECSPR has created a common foundation for business crowdfunding, while ESMA and national authorities continue to clarify how platforms should disclose risk, operate bulletin boards and identify project owners.

Technology will improve credit analysis, portfolio automation and investor reporting. Artificial intelligence may help platforms process borrower documents and monitor warning signals.

Better technology cannot eliminate defaults. The quality of the platform will still depend on underwriting discipline, legal enforcement and honest reporting.

For European investors, crowdlending can provide access to private credit and business financing that is difficult to obtain through public markets. The potential return comes with real credit, liquidity and platform risk.

A good P2P investment decision begins with one question: what must happen for the borrower to repay?

The app matters. The interest rate matters. The licence matters. But the repayment source matters most.

Sources and data notes

This article was revised for a European audience in July 2026 using current EU regulatory guidance and the latest completed market reporting, including:

- European Securities and Markets Authority, Market Report: Crowdfunding in the EU 2025, based on 2024 market data.

- ESMA’s interactive EU crowdfunding dashboard.

- European Commission guidance on the European Crowdfunding Service Providers Regulation.

- ESMA Q&A on the €5 million crowdfunding threshold.

- ESMA Q&A on ECSPR bulletin boards and secondary-market disclosures.

- European Banking Authority technical standards on credit scoring, loan pricing, portfolio management and contingency funds.